Home
|
« Liberal Outrage: July 2012 | Main | Liberal Outrage: September 2012 » Liberal OutrageReally hits me From Paul Ryan's convention speech last night: Wow... i never thought of it that way before, but... yeah. That describes my life exactly. That's the world i live in. And i'm not going to settle for it! I demand an adventure, wherein when i get old i will have to pay for my health care with the coins that may or may not have fallen under my sofa cushions. How exciting that will be! By fnord12 | August 30, 2012, 12:54 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link I don't know why i bother reading the news. It just depresses me. I should stick with cute pictures of baby guinea pigs in espresso cups or something. In fact, there are roughly 335 federal statutes on the books (.pdf) passed by Congress giving dozens upon dozens of federal agencies the power of the administrative subpoena, according to interviews and government reports. That's despite proof that FBI agents given such powers under the Patriot Act quickly began to abuse them and illegally collected Americans' communications records, including those of reporters. Two scathing reports from the Justice Department's Inspector General uncovered routine and pervasive illegal use of administrative subpoenas by FBI anti-terrorism agents given nearly carte blanche authority to demand records about Americans' communications with no supervision. When the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, perhaps the nation's most liberal appeals court based in San Francisco, ordered Golden Valley to fork over the data earlier this month, the court said the case was "easily" decided because the records were "relevant" to a government drug investigation. With the data the Alaska utility handed over, the DEA may then use further administrative subpoenas to acquire the suspected indoor-dope growers' phone records, stored e-mails, and perhaps credit-card purchasing histories -- all to build a case to acquire a probable-cause warrant to physically search their homes and businesses. But the administrative subpoena doesn't just apply to utility records and drug cases. Congress has spread the authority across a huge swath of the U.S. government, for investigating everything from hazardous waste disposal, the environment, atomic energy, child exploitation, food stamp fraud, medical insurance fraud, terrorism, securities violations, satellites, seals, student loans, and for breaches of dozens of laws pertaining to fruits, vegetables, livestock and crops. Another fabulous move by our lawmakers. You go, Congress! Get those pot smokers off the streets! They're a real menace to society. Who needs stinkin' probable cause and rights and stuff? It's certainly less important than catching people committing food stamp fraud (and probably whilst high! - damn surfers). By min | August 29, 2012, 12:28 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link In a post where he's thinking way too hard about why George W. Bush isn't more prominent right now, and, for example, campaigning for Romney (the answer's easy: he's unpopular), Drum works himself into this: That doesn't leave much. Pretty much all that's left is the PATRIOT Act and the Medicare prescription drug bill. That's not much for eight years. First of all, whatever you think of them, both the PATRIOT Act and the Medicare prescription drug bills are HUGE. So is No Child Left Behind, which is still in effect despite what Drum implies. And "wants to repeal key provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley" is, again, a far cry from saying the law doesn't have any effect. Drum also massively understates the implications of the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions and the Bush tax cuts. And, maybe because he's a partisan Democrat, he ignores all of the "states secrets" and drone killings, and Guantanamo, and all of the other awful things that Obama has picked up from Bush and happily continued and expanded upon. This is like saying the legacy of Chernobyl is thin because i hear there is some moss growing there now and the Russian government is considering a land restoration program. By fnord12 | August 24, 2012, 9:00 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link Cause why wouldn't they want to own a copy of The Dictator's Practical Internet Guide to Power Retention? Now, i know you can just download the PDF for free, but i feel that something like this i'd want a physical copy of. That way i can write myself little notes in the margins, highlight the best passages, take it with me after the coup when i'm on the run from those i've oppressed, etc etc. The book actually talks about the techniques being used to undermine dissent and neutralize movements and, according to Boing Boing, is a "very good critique of the state of Internet liberation technologies -- a critical analysis of what works, what needs work, and what doesn't work in the world of networked technologies that hope to serve as a force for democratization and self-determination." Ofc, if it does proffer some practical ideas on how to maintain my dictatorial hold on those around me, well, that would be a nice bonus. By min | August 23, 2012, 1:11 PM | Boooooks
& Liberal Outrage | Link "We want to show this principle: That a handgun is printable," says Wilson, a 24-year-old second-year law student at the University of Texas. "You don't need to be able to put 200 rounds through it...It only has to fire once. But even if the design is a little unworkable, it doesn't matter, as long as it has that guarantee of lethality." I'm sure the inventors of the RepRap are just thrilled. Someone tell Dave Mustaine he doesn't have to worry about Obama taking away his guns anymore. He can just print as many as he wants. Fucking Texas... By min | August 23, 2012, 1:03 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link TPM has one of those periodic articles where a rock band tells a politician to stop using their damn music. This time it's Twisted Sister's We're Not Gonna Take It (Dee Snider: "There is almost nothing he [Ryan] stands for that I agree with except the use of the P90X."). But i actually thought some of the comments on this one were funny. It starts with: Is it by Ted Nugent? Yes --> You can use it. No --> You can't use it. End of flowchart. But then someone brings up Megadeth: Romney and Ryan just need to play Megadeth and Dave Mustaine won't have a problem with it. Think of the. possibilities: And the first response to that. Holy Krap! Are those real song titles? Geez, has anyone suggested a valium for this guy? Someone responds to her saying "You're sweet". But just to stick up for one of my childhood favorites here, Megadeth's songs were typically anti-war, especially anti-nuclear war, and their song titles and lyrics depict the horror of war, not a celebration of it. Mustaine's crazy right-wing (or maybe just crazy) views are a recent, post-religious conversion development (the latest: "Back in my country, my President is trying to pass a gun ban so he's staging all these murders like the Fast and Furious thing down at the border and Aurora, Colorado, and all the people who were killed there and now the beautiful people at the Sikh temple."). It's bad enough that Dave Mustaine is a kook now, but i don't like it when these ignorant political junkies attack his back catalog! And i don't think valium would have mixed well with the other things in Mustaine's system at the time. By fnord12 | August 23, 2012, 7:41 AM | Liberal Outrage & Music | Comments (1)| Link Joe Biden is written by Brian Michael Bendis: By fnord12 | August 21, 2012, 10:31 AM | Comics
& Liberal Outrage | Comments (1)| Link While i've disputed Paul Ryan's policy wonk credentials, i do like this proposal that candidates should take advantage of modern technology and produce some internet videos that explain their policy ideas in detail. The article uses the popularity of the Ross Perot infomercials to show that the public is a lot more hungry for actual policy discussions than the 1 minute attack ads and our content-less televised debates allow for. By fnord12 | August 14, 2012, 4:36 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link I sort of hinted at this in passing in my first Ryan post, but Yglesias says it clearly: There's always the fact that politicians will try to conflate the two, but they are in fact very different things. By fnord12 | August 13, 2012, 12:10 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link I've already linked to Krugman three times in my "primer", but here's Krugman again (who better to go to when evaluating a guy whose main accomplishment is a budget proposal than an economist?). In this one, he's reacting to pundits reacting to Ryan. And the main point is that Ryan is good at exploiting the fact that pundits like looking bi-partisan, finding a politician on the right and the left and pretending that each candidate is serious and proposing plans with merit. And as Krugman and others have shown, that just isn't the case with Ryan. His "serious" budget is mostly smoke and mirrors. But most pundits are pretty lazy and don't have the backgrounds to understand this stuff anyway, so the fact that Ryan has a bunch of stuff written down is all it takes to hoodwink them. By fnord12 | August 13, 2012, 11:44 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link I've been pretty ambivalent about the presidential election this year on the grounds that you've basically got two centrists, neither with a viable plan for fixing our unemployment issues. Even though i'm pretty obviously on the left side of things, Obama's been pretty bad on important foreign policy issues (assassinations, state secrets, prosecuting whistle-blowers) and pretty wimpy on nearly everything else, and i've been musing about the fact that if Romney won, at least we'd lose the gridlock in Congress. But now Romney is moderate no more. He's picked the very radical Paul Ryan as his running mate. "Eliminate medicare and replace it with unindexed vouchers" Ryan. "Cut discretionary spending from 12 percent of GDP now to 3 1/2 percent of GDP" Ryan. "Lower taxes on the rich and create huge deficits" Ryan. Wherever you fall on these issues, at least now we're getting a real national debate. The SuperMegaMonkey Paul Ryan primer: By fnord12 | August 13, 2012, 10:19 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link « Liberal Outrage: July 2012 | Main | Liberal Outrage: September 2012 » |