Home
|
« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 » January 31, 2007Madman Newsweek (found via This Modern World): By fnord12 | January 31, 2007, 4:06 PM | Liberal Outrage & Ummm... Other? | Comments (6) | Link Is Captain Marvel key to the end of Civil War? This weekend i read The Return, which brings the long dead Captain Marvel into the Marvel Universe via a dimensional warp from the past. Based on the Mark Gruenwald rules of time travel, which states that whenever you travel backward or forward in time you actually create an alternate dimension (thus eliminating all those messy paradoxes of people changing the past or learning their future), this isn't the "real" Captain Marvel so it's not really a "return". It was a really bad comic, poorly written, poorly paced, and leaving you with a real feeling of "what's the point?", and i assumed it was just a throw-away time filler because Civil War is running so late. But then after reading a few things on the newsgroups, i remembered that Nitro, the villain whose explosion started the Civil War, was also the man who (inadvertantly) killed Captain Marvel by exposing him to the toxins that gave him cancer. Now, if you ignore the Gruenwald time travel rules, you could easily imagine a Civil War "reboot" that involves Captain Marvel learning about Nitro giving him cancer and/or starting the Civil War, and when he travels back in time to stop Nitro once and for all, he stops the events that cause Civil War. This would be incredibly lame and judging from the post-Civil War projects that are coming out it doesn't seem likely, but it could be an "out" if fan reaction to the new status quo is very bad. By fnord12 | January 31, 2007, 1:37 PM | Comics | Comments (10) | Link People Like to Smoke Crack, Too It's enjoyable and there's not an alternative product. The Altria Group, better known as Philip-Morris, is "spinning off" the Kraft portion of the business to shareholders cause they feel that it's really just a drag on their profits. He added: "If frozen dinners get too expensive, people will try something else. That's not true with cigarettes -- you are not up at night worried about that product that is going to make cigarettes obsolete." One might point out that the reason for this is that cigarettes are addictive. Like crack. Or heroin. Or that other socially acceptable drug - alcohol. So, yeah, i can see how a flunctuation in price might not affect tobacco sales. It's good to capitalize on someone's illness. Afterall, even if you don't, someone else will. You might as well get in on it. At least you donate money to the local charity every christmas. Now, just because their legally addictive product is doing well all around the world doesn't mean Philip-Morris is resting on its laurels. No, no. They continue to work hard to bring you new and innovative waves to get your nicotine fix. It also hopes eventually to lure consumers with new tobacco products, including a small tea-bag-like pouch that is smoke- free, spit-free and tucks into the cheek. And so that you can get an idea of the mentality of the people involved, "The exciting part for me," said Bonnie Herzog, an analyst at Citigroup, "is that tobacco use today will evolve. It's unlikely that there will ever be a 100 percent safe cigarette, but we feel that a reduced-risk cigarette is on the horizon." Dear Bonnie. You're an idiot and conscienceless. I hope you don't pass on your genetic material. Enjoy your wealth, you dosey cow. By min | January 31, 2007, 9:14 AM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link
So Very True You should know that at the mere mention of Mario Party, be it the Eighth Version or any other entry, Gabriel begins to curse and sweat. He is philosophically opposed to what he perceives as the series' communist ideals: between the game's aggressively random nature and its deep-seated compulsion to reward mediocrity, he hardly feels like he's playing a "game" at all. Rather, he feels as though he is flipping a coin via some elaborate, unaccountable mechanism - a single coin that takes an hour to flip. It is his belief that there are other things he could be doing. For example (and this is just something I came up with off the top of my head) he could be playing a game where his input is correlated with the outcome. In some way. By fnord12 | January 30, 2007, 5:05 PM | Video Games | Comments (1) | Link Civil War II The Super-Hero Registration Act comes to Earth and learns about the human condition. By fnord12 | January 30, 2007, 4:28 PM | Comics| Link Bush To End Regulatory Tyranny Stolen directly from today's TPMmuckraker who stole it... "In an executive order published last week in the Federal Register, Mr. Bush said that each agency must have a regulatory policy office run by a political appointee, to supervise the development of rules and documents providing guidance to regulated industries. The White House will thus have a gatekeeper in each agency to analyze the costs and the benefits of new rules and to make sure the agencies carry out the president's priorities." That's right, each agency (like, for instance, the Environmental Protection Agency and Occupational Safety and Health Administration) will now have a politically appointed babysitter to make sure that regulations aren't too onerous for corporations. In fact, the directive ensures that regulation is the absolute last resort: "in deciding whether to issue regulations, federal agencies must identify 'the specific market failure' or problem that justifies government intervention." "Business groups welcomed the executive order," the Times notes, in a terrific understatement. By min | January 30, 2007, 1:30 PM | Liberal Outrage| Link Pink Sheet room, please. "Tough crowd tonight," we thoughtfully said. Chris then offered us a look at the odd soul of the Washington press corps. His eyes stared past ours, scanning the Mayflower's block-long lobby in a classic thousand-yard stare. "I just saw the most incredible prostitute," he weirdly said. (Instead of "prostitute," he may have said "hooker.") To Plotkin's credit - again, we don't know him - he seemed to be just as surprised as we were by Chris' oddball comment. But Chris wasn't through with his weird discussion; his eyes continued to scan the long hall as he said something like, "Yeah, you have to ask for the 'pink sheet' rooms when you check in." (Not an exact quote.) At no point did Plotkin seem to think that this was a recognizable topic. For ourselves, we'd have to say it was the strangest thing any man has ever said to us. No, it simply isn't our experience that men make such weird comments to other men - much less, to men whom they barely know. Men like Matthews apparently think that this is standard male discussion. (We googled and Nexised "pink sheet" the next day. We found no usage which conformed to what Chris had said.) By fnord12 | January 30, 2007, 1:28 PM | Liberal Outrage & Ummm... Other?| Link *Whistle* I blame the brain hemorrhaging. Taylor Killian, 18, had rubbed his body with grapeseed oil to keep from being caught, and got up after the first time he was shocked to continue running toward a group of frightened students huddled in a corner at Westerville North High School, Lt. Jeff Gaylor said. "That prank went a little farther than he intended, I guess," Gaylor said. And, no, i didn't get this from the Oddly Enoughs this time. I was on a respectable site. TPM. So there. :P By min | January 30, 2007, 1:25 PM | Ummm... Other?| Link My Brain Bleeds for You I would have preferred if they said caesareans decrease the risk of brain haemorrhaging because stated this way, it makes it sound like vaginal births are the new thing. "This new way of giving birth is actually riskier than the good ol' caesarean." Also, they're saying how this bleeding of the brain could be leading to developmental problems. Well, considering how many babies were born vaginally since the dawn of time, i'm thinking it can't be new problems that are just now occurring. Not that we shouldn't try to prevent brain haemorrhaging. I'm sure less bleeding of the brain can only be a good thing. Ofc, now that this has been discovered, it explains why so many people are afflicted with stupid. Who's surprised that squeezing a baby's head thru a tiny canal (no matter how much stretching there is) might actually cause a tiny bit of damage? Duh. That's all. By min | January 30, 2007, 12:56 PM | Science| Link The Police, Again Or is it gonna be "Sting & the Police"? Hmm.... Previously rumored and now publicly confirmed, The Police are going to get together to open for the Grammy Awards. They're also planning on doing a world tour. How many shows do you think they'll get thru before they break up again? And do you think any trips to the emergency room will precipitate the break up or do you think they'll manage to refrain from beating the crap out of each other in frustration? By min | January 30, 2007, 12:51 PM | Music | Comments (1) | Link Feingold Taking a Stance For all the harsh criticism against President Bush's plan to send more troops to Iraq, most Democrats blanch at the notion of cutting funding for new troops. Not Mr. Feingold, who believes his party has been too timid on this front. This is how Mr. Feingold opened the hearing: "There is little doubt that decisive action from the Congress is needed. Despite the results of the election, and two months of study and supposed consultation -- during which experts and members of Congress from across the political spectrum argued for a new policy -- the president has decided to escalate the war. When asked whether he would persist in this policy despite congressional opposition, he replied: 'Frankly, that's not their responsibility.' Last week Vice President Cheney was asked whether the non-binding resolution passed by the Foreign Relations Committee that will soon be considered by the full Senate would deter the President from escalating the war. He replied: 'It's not going to stop us.'" This coincides with Bush being the "decider" and Cheney's statement that he's the VP and you're not. I love snappy comebacks. I'm happy to see someone actually making a tough stance. I just fear that instead of getting behind this in a united front, the Dems instead will try to distance themselves from the "radical". Hey, guys, it's not high school anymore. You don't have to impress the popular kids and shun the "nerds". I really really really hope they get the marketing to work for them on this one. Feingold has already stated that this will not affect the troops' supplies and salaries. It will only prevent more deployment of soldiers. They really need to push that meme because the neo-con PR machine is already in place and very good and dealing out misinformation to the willfully misinformed. The Democrats need to put up a united front on this with no holdouts on their side and they need to make sure they work the media machine. Fast. As i was told, even if you have the superior product, you can lose out because the inferior product had the better marketing. 8 years of Bush is a harsh price to pay for poor marketing decisions. Have they learned their lesson? Are we cutting thru the bozone* layer? I have no high expectations, but i would like to be pleasantly surprised. Edwards has already introduced legislation to do the same. That's 2. And one of them running for president. Hope this lights a fire under the fence straddlers.
By min | January 30, 2007, 12:33 PM | Liberal Outrage| Link Good Enough Bridge the Gap, a non-profit org specializing in nuclear safety issues, sent a proposal to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 2004 to toughen up their security measures and to build steel cages around nuclear reactors in an effort to deflect the impact of a plane. The NRC's response? Now, i haven't read Bridge the Gap's proposals nor do i know anything about nuclear power plant safety. Mebbe their proposal is completely wacky and impractical. Mebbe steel cages is not going to do squat against a jetliner. How should i know? I just want to point out that the NRC's response is not exactly reassuring. It boils down to "good enough" and "not our responsibility". I guess none of the NRC officials live near a nuclear reactor so it doesn't really matter much to them either way. Thanks guys. Good lookin' out. By min | January 30, 2007, 12:24 PM | Liberal Outrage| Link
Service Announcement I am obligated to publish this link that Wanyas forwarded to me so that all in my D&D "This is not just chess, football or bridge. This is a game that envelops the player in an entirely different fantasy world in which the power of magic and violence is pervasive. It is a game with a distinct and seductive spiritual worldview that is diametrically opposed to the Bible. "Yes, sorcery appears in the Bible. But it is NEVER in the context of a good thing to do. It is always presented as something dangerous and utterly contrary to the will of God," says Schnoebelen. Click the link to learn how the goal of D&D is "to see who could obtain the most erotic pleasure." And as a bonus, there's a link on the bottom of the page where you can learn about Wicca, Satan's little white lie. By fnord12 | January 29, 2007, 6:39 PM | D&D | Comments (2) | Link From TV to Movie Name actors and actresses who started off in TV and moved on to achieve movie success. For example, Bruce Willis from TV's Moonlighting, Johnny Depp from 21 Jump Street, Tom Hanks from Bosom Buddies, etc. Comediens and musicians do not qualify (e.g., Adam Sandler, Will Smith, etc.) because it's possible their movie career was helped by their success in this other category. They must have at least been a main character in some TV series before moving on to movie stardom. So Brad Pitt's 2 appearances on Growing Pains would not count as being "in TV". Movie success would constitute having a minimum of 3, non-serial movies that were well-received by the public. In other words, a "successful" movie. For this reason, a Jennifer Aniston or a Sarah Michelle Gellar might not make the list, even though they have been in several movies. However, feel free to argue for your choices. We reserve the right to reject anyone you can think of based on random judgements and lack of familiarity with either the person or their body of work. I've already started you off with three. Now you may begin. By min | January 29, 2007, 1:26 PM | Movies & TeeVee | Comments (25) | Link The Kaiser Network I don't know who they are or what they do. But they're they Kaiser Network, ferchrissakes. The Kaiser. By min | January 29, 2007, 1:20 PM | Ummm... Other?| Link Anti-depressant Leads to Suicides Seems to me that if an anti-depressant can lead to someone committing suicide, it's not a very good anti-depressant, is it? GlaxoSmithKline is going to get slammed on a British expose for withholding the results of their clinical trials, advertising the drug as safe for children when the test results showed otherwise. Jofre also found an email in which a public relations executive for GSK clearly said that the drug was not effective among children. "Originally we had planned to do extensive media relations surrounding this study until we actually viewed the results. Essentially the study did not really show it was effective in treating adolescent depression, which is not something we want to publicize", the email read. Meanwhile a spokesman for GSK said that his company denies of any wrongdoing...GSK utterly rejects any suggestion that it has improperly withheld drug trial information", he said. That's right. They very properly withheld the drug trial information, following the guidelilnes listed in the Pharmaceutical Drug-Pusher's Handbook: A Guide to Successfully Selling Your Merchandise to the Public. It's always worked well for their drugs in the past, and every pharmaceutical corporation swears by it. By min | January 29, 2007, 12:50 PM | Science| Link Battle Royale If you're anything like me, there's nothing you like more than watching Japanese teenagers kill each other. Unfortunately there aren't a lot of opportunities to see things like that. Sure you could probably kidnap a few kids and arrange something yourself, but that's frowned upon by the law in most states. Luckily, director Kinji Fukasaku feels your pain and created Battle Royale just for you. While it has the flimsiest plot this side of a Godzilla/porn movie*, it's got Japanese teenagers killing each other. And that's really all you need. And best of all, the sequel is already at the top of the queue. By fnord12 | January 29, 2007, 9:12 AM | Movies | Comments (4) | Link Free Woody But you shoud go sign the Woody Woodpecker on DVD petition just to be safe. By fnord12 | January 29, 2007, 9:09 AM | TeeVee| Link
Voted to eliminate the minimum wage: Link: Alexander (R-TN) By fnord12 | January 26, 2007, 12:42 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link Even Crack Dealers Care About the Constitution As Josh Marshall put it. On behalf of his client, an alleged crack cocaine dealer who's accused of killing a man he'd robbed to prevent him from talking to the police, Little Rock lawyer John Hall has challenged the appointment of Timothy Griffin, the recently-appointed U.S. Attorney for eastern Arkansas with close ties to the White House. Meanwhile in the Senate, Schumer (D-NY) is moving to have a Judiciary Committee hearing on the firings and appointments of Attorney Generals by Gonzalez and Feinstein (D-CA) (along with Specter, R-PA) is working to get a bill thru to close this loophole. Ofc, Specter was responsible for the loophole being there in the first place, but i guess he gets points for cleaning up his mess. By min | January 26, 2007, 12:34 PM | Liberal Outrage| Link Manufacturing Consent From Dana Milbank at the Washington Post: This delicious morsel about the "Meet the Press" host and the vice president was part of the extensive dish Cathie Martin served up yesterday when the former Cheney communications director took the stand in the perjury trial of former Cheney chief of staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Flashed on the courtroom computer screens were her notes from 2004 about how Cheney could respond to allegations that the Bush administration had played fast and loose with evidence of Iraq's nuclear ambitions. Option 1: "MTP-VP," she wrote, then listed the pros and cons of a vice presidential appearance on the Sunday show. Under "pro," she wrote: "control message." "I suggested we put the vice president on 'Meet the Press,' which was a tactic we often used," Martin testified. "It's our best format." "How embarrassing for Russert. He's been shown the fool. A mere puppet. How will he respond?") More from the Post: But the trial has already pulled back the curtain on the White House's PR techniques and confirmed some of the darkest suspicions of the reporters upon whom they are used. Relatively junior White House aides run roughshod over members of the president's Cabinet. Bush aides charged with speaking to the public and the media are kept out of the loop on some of the most important issues. And bad news is dumped before the weekend for the sole purpose of burying it. By fnord12 | January 26, 2007, 8:55 AM | Liberal Outrage| Link Make it so From Americablog: "He's tried this two times - it's failed twice," the California Democrat said. "I asked him at the White House, 'Mr. President, why do you think this time it's going to work?' And he said, 'Because I told them it had to.' " Asked if the president had elaborated, she added that he simply said, " 'I told them that they had to.' That was the end of it. That's the way it is." Transcript, including punchline: PELOSI: He's tried this two times - it's failed twice. I asked him at the White House, 'Mr. President, why do you think this time it's going to work?' By fnord12 | January 26, 2007, 8:51 AM | Liberal Outrage| Link
I know what's best for you, so shut up. Link: Q: "By taking the policy you have, haven't you, Mr. Vice President, ignored the expressed will of the American people in the November election?" The vice president: "Well, Chris, this president, and I don't think any president worth his salt can afford to make decisions of this magnitude according to the polls. The polls change." Q: "This was an election, sir." The vice president: "Polls change day by day, week by week." By fnord12 | January 25, 2007, 12:31 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link Very good Obama supports universal health care. Throw a major project to overhaul mass transportation in this country and maybe the democrats can become the party of ideas. By fnord12 | January 25, 2007, 11:47 AM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (3) | Link No Habeas Corpus For You Spored sent this lovely little pick-me-up. Attorney General Gonzalez manages to stun the Senate Judiciary Committee with his interpretation of the Constitution. Specter was incredulous, asking how the Constitution could bar the suspension of a right that didn't exist... Habeas corpus is an extremely important right for us to have. We're pretty much screwed if they decide we don't automatically have such a right. One law prof quoted puts it pretty plainly. "This is the key protection that people have if they're held in violation of the law,'' said Erwin Chemerinsky, a Duke University law professor who has criticized the administration's actions on civil liberties. "If there's no habeas corpus, and if the government wants to pick you or me off the street and hold us indefinitely, how do we get our release?''[emphasis mine] This type of "logic" doesn't just affect habeas corpus. Many of the fundamental rights we hold dear aren't directly stated. They're all bestowed by wording saying it can't be taken away. For instance, the First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Now apply Gonzalez's version of reasoning to that. See the problem? The only positive thing that occurred was Specter's exchange with Gonzalez. Gonzales: There is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution. There's a prohibition against taking it away. ... By min | January 25, 2007, 11:00 AM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link
Little boxes on the hillside, There's a green one and a pink one And the people in the houses And there's doctors and lawyers, And they all play on the golf course And the children go to summer camp And the boys go into business There's a green one and a pink one *currently used on the Showtime series Weeds, which may or may not actually be kinda good. the jury's still out on that one. i just want points for the actors i recognized. By min | January 25, 2007, 9:17 AM | Music| Link Somewhere between cute and freaky-weird By fnord12 | January 25, 2007, 9:15 AM | Ummm... Other?| Link
Marvel Sales for December P O'B's analysis up on The Beat. By fnord12 | January 24, 2007, 5:25 PM | Comics| Link Good. It's a Majority. We bring democracy. Democracy good. Iraq's parliament is at a total standstill. They might be earning $120k, but safety is such a huge issue that the salary barely pays for the guards hired by members to protect them. One guy says he has 40 bodyguards and the money only covers 20. The speaker of the parliament is thinking of trying to clamp down on the rampant absenteeism. He hit a slight snag on that, though. He needs a quorum in order to pass the proposal. By min | January 24, 2007, 10:22 AM | Liberal Outrage| Link
There won't be any gas left by 2017 So we'll make that goal, easy. By fnord12 | January 23, 2007, 3:50 PM | Liberal Outrage| Link Schadenfreude schadenfreude [shahd-n-froi-duh] -noun- satisfaction or pleasure felt at someone else's misfortune. By min | January 23, 2007, 2:56 PM | Good Words | Comments (1) | Link End the war from the comfort of your own home Sign up. It's 15 bucks a month. You won't even notice that it's gone. So we're launching our own massive escalation. More pressure on Congress, more voices calling on Democrats to stand up to the president, more Americans opposed to the war. It'll cost about $90,000 per month for the resources required - including skilled staff organizers deployed around the country. If 6,000 of us chip in $15 a month, we can do it. Can you give $15 a month to end the war? By fnord12 | January 23, 2007, 11:46 AM | Liberal Outrage| Link
Alright, i've had it I challenge all of you to a knife fight. One on one or all at a time. Let's go! No one licks me in a knife fight. By fnord12 | January 22, 2007, 1:44 PM | My stupid life | Comments (6) | Link
No really, it's called the Constitution I appreciate Mr. Freedom Fries trying to make amends, but don't we already have something for this?: Follow up from the article Tapped links to: Such a basic expression of the separation of powers should be obvious. But with the Bush Administration, one never knows. So H.J. Res 14 spells it out. "This resolution says a strong message that Congress won't stand idly by and it won't get railroaded into another war that will only make America and the world less safe," said Rep. Marty Meehan. "A lot of people in Congress are fearful that this war will expand," added Rep. Ron Paul. Containing an expansion of the war, said Rep. Neil Abercrombie, is "the most important issue this Congress will face aside from Iraq." They're basically pushing through a law that says "You have to follow the Constitution". (Of course Bush can still do whatever he wants after the law is passed, with the proper signing statement.) I'm not feeling secure about the whole democratic process today. By fnord12 | January 19, 2007, 2:52 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link My hobbies are not like your hobbies. You know you're doing things right when you're slogging through comments like this: Yeah, but assuming temporal parallelism gets you into all kinds of trouble. By fnord12 | January 19, 2007, 2:44 PM | Comics| Link Vindication! Rutgers came out with a paper called Life Without Children. It's about how fewer married couples have children. It talks about how society has changed, how the perception of parenthood has changed in our culture, and how more old people are having sex. Besides feeling vindicated, I found some things in the paper to be quite interesting. I feel this is all totally right. Kids are stressful and hard work. The possibility for cuteness doesn't really outweigh all of that, imo. Plus, they often look like worms or shrunken old people for the first couple of months right after they're born. Even after the first couple of months when they stop being shrivelled, they might still not be cute. Some kids, just like some people, are destined to be fugly. I think most people are shallow enough to care. Also, considering my personality, there's just no way i couldn't be disappointed in my child. I have been told by one or two people that i have a somewhat exacting nature. No sense in raising a kid with some sort of neurosis. That would just be mean. It was all working perfectly fine when people didn't expect to be happy in their marriage. Young people today are spoiled by their romantic ideals. They need to grow up and be more realistic. Marriage is supposed to be miserable. That's why you have kids. So you don't have time to dwell on how miserable you are. And when the kids move out, you're supposed to drop dead. Today's older generation is not complying. They aren't getting enfeebled and dead fast enough. They're actually having lives. And sex. "Sex is now part of the fun and freedom of the early adult years before children. Similarly, sex has become part of the pleasures of life after children. Many of today's parents are entering the empty nest years with subscriptions to Match.com, prescriptions for Viagra and hopes for hot new romances." Jazmine's response to that last bit was predictably "Ew." Finally, high levels of educational attainment contribute to childlessness. Women who hold four-year college degrees are more likely to be childless than women with lower levels of educational attainment. Apparently, the Mormons in Utah were right all along. Women should be kept ignorant so that they'll spend their time churning out babies like god intended, dammit! This whole education thing is messing things up. You know, my parents might kick themselves if they knew about that last bit. To think, all that pushing for me to do well in school has contributed to their current lack of grandparent status. Hmm. I thought about printing this paper out and handing out copies to my relatives, but fnord12 said, "They don't care, they want babies! Your happiness has nothing to do with it". He's almost right. They do want babies. But they do care about my happiness. It's just that they're convinced that it's tied inexorably to babies. Mostly, so there'll be someone to take care of your enfeebled, old self. Also, i hear that another benefit of having kids is you can ask them to record things off the cable for you. Very convincing argument. My mom almost had me with that one. So close. By min | January 19, 2007, 12:01 PM | My stupid life | Comments (12) | Link Social Security Panic....again Just in time for another attempt to privatise social security. There's clearly only one solution. The Logan's Run solution. It's not like most of us care about the elderly anyway. The freak us out with their obvious mortality. By min | January 19, 2007, 9:49 AM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (2) | Link Cigarettes Made More Addictive Deliberately? Gee, i find that so hard to believe. Why would the cigarette companies do such a thing? Needless to say, Phillip Morris took issue with the study. By min | January 19, 2007, 9:44 AM | Liberal Outrage & Science | Comments (4) | Link Ronnie James Dio Lyric of the Week You get cut before you see it By fnord12 | January 19, 2007, 9:21 AM | Music | Comments (4) | Link Spirit of Cooperation I suppose i can hold out hope that they just got it wrong in the translation, but i'm not that optimistic. It's so pathetic that our government can make these statements in earnest without the weight of their hypocrisy crushing them into flat pancakes. China shot down one of their old weather satellites about a week ago. Here is the "intelligent" response our nation is so famous for. "The United States believes China's development and testing of such weapons is inconsistent with the spirit of cooperation that both countries aspire to in the civil space area," AP quoted National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe as saying. "We and other countries have expressed our concern to the Chinese," he said. Ok. I don't know if i should laugh or cry in shame. We're going to go and give a lecture about civility and cooperation while in the same breath discuss the satellites we have in orbit to spy on other countries? I'm sure this was reported with absolutely no hint of irony. WTF is wrong with you people? It gets better. Read on. AP said President Bush signed an order last October asserting the United States' right to deny adversaries access to space for hostile purposes. As part of the first revision of U.S. space policy in nearly 10 years, the policy also said the U.S. would oppose the development of treaties or other restrictions that seek to prohibit or limit U.S. access to or use of space. There's nothing more effective for making friends and gaining respect than saying "You're my bitch". Gotta love the "do as i say, not as i do" policy this administration adheres to. AP said that what drove China to act now remains a mystery. AP should get its head out of its butt. Mebbe what drove China to "act now" is the sad fact that the United States is being run by a bunch of lunatics and fascists whose diplomatic approach entails such well thought out strategies as "Glass 'em" and "You're either with us or against us" so they figured they ought to be prepared. Or mebbe they were tired of being spied on. By min | January 19, 2007, 8:35 AM | Liberal Outrage & Science| Link
I work hard on this blog. Why can't the troops put just as much effort into their jobs? Link: Could you imagine the reaction from Ledeen's pals at Pajamas Media if Markos Moulitsas (or God forbid, John Kerry) had said exactly the same thing in the exactly the same context? It would have been a pure shitstorm of indignation. Roger Simon would have written a cute little post about liberal reactionaries that incorporated a Buddy Holly song, Charles Johnson would have cited it as inconvertible proof of the worldwide conspiracy between Islam and The Left to enslave us all using the Vulcan Mindmeld, Glenn Reynolds would have sputtered something about Markos (and/or Kerry) hating America and the troops, while Michelle Malkin synthesized it all into a really stupid post of fifteen or so very small words. By fnord12 | January 18, 2007, 4:24 PM | Liberal Outrage| Link Are you ready to rock???!??? I just want everyone to know that my ipod is currently the hard rock capital of the world. You want Motley Crue? Def Leppard? Judas Priest? Dio? Ratt? Hell, do you want Accept and Manowar? I am rocking all of that. And i'm a better person for it. Now get your balls to the wall and be my lover tonight. Ummm, or something. By fnord12 | January 18, 2007, 1:58 PM | Music | Comments (7) | Link "You have had all that money can give you, but that wasn't Die! Die! Die! Die! Die! Die! Die! Die! "Kill for the thrill. (assassin) Some people think newspapers Die! Die! Die! Die! Die! By fnord12 | January 18, 2007, 7:54 AM | Music| Link See? The gas station attendant told me to have a nice weekend. It must be Friday. By fnord12 | January 18, 2007, 7:53 AM | My stupid life | Comments (2) | Link
Worse Than Ballitus Some radio station hosted a contest where they gave contestants water to drink and whoever held their pee the longest, won a Wii. Well, a 28-yr old ended up dead from water intoxication because of it. Ms Strange may have drunk nearly two gallons (7.5 litres), witnesses said. "She was crying and that was the last that anyone had heard from her." Drinking too much water can eventually cause the brain to swell, stopping it regulating vital functions such as breathing, and causing death. She only came in second. By min | January 17, 2007, 1:34 PM | Ummm... Other? | Comments (4) | Link Doomsday Approacheth First off, there's a Doomsday Clock?? Second, the scientists in charge of it have decided that the current situation in the world merits moving the minute hand 2 minutes closer to midnight. Great. The University of Cambridge mathematician's comments came as the time on the doomsday clock, which counts down to nuclear Armageddon, was moved two minutes closer to midnight, reflecting concerns among scientists over the rise of new nuclear powers. Climate change was also increasing the threat of catastrophic damage to the planet, academics at the Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists (BAS) said. How do they determine how many minutes to move the clock? What is the scale they're using? I'd like to see some of that math. This is all very nice and symbolic and everything, but is the best this group of scientists, which includes 18 Nobel laureates, can do is move the hand on some clock and put a picture of it on a magazine? That's so sad and totally useless. It makes me think of a group of sad, bent old men working together to push a giant minute hand on a huge clock deep in a pit while the rest of the world ignores or jeers at them. By min | January 17, 2007, 1:13 PM | Science | Comments (4) | Link We're number 53! We're number 53! Alright! We have the 53rd most free press in the world! Take that, islamofascists! Democracies and open societies will always prevail! Why? Freelance journalist and blogger Josh Wolf was imprisoned when he refused to hand over his video archives. Sudanese cameraman Sami al-Haj, who works for the pan-Arab broadcaster Al-Jazeera, has been held without trial since June 2002 at the US military base at Guantanamo, and Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein has been held by US authorities in Iraq since April this year. By fnord12 | January 17, 2007, 9:53 AM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (2) | Link Cancer* In an article i was reading yesterday, it was mentioned in passing that we've spent more money on the Iraq invasion so far than has ever been spent on researching a cure for cancer. And amazingly, we have less to show for it. At least our cancer research hasn't made cancer worse (unless you count mammograms). *I was going to do a title that did something with cancer cells vs. terrorist cells but i couldn't think of anything good and the Iraq invasion had nothing to do with terrorism anyway. By fnord12 | January 17, 2007, 9:46 AM | Liberal Outrage| Link
That wasn't exactly the top question on my mind. link: By fnord12 | January 16, 2007, 12:38 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link
It was never about the oil Link: The US government has been involved in drawing up the law, a draft of which has been seen by The Independent on Sunday. It would give big oil companies such as BP, Shell and Exxon 30-year contracts to extract Iraqi crude and allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil interests in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972. The huge potential prizes for Western firms will give ammunition to critics who say the Iraq war was fought for oil. They point to statements such as one from Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in 1999, while he was still chief executive of the oil services company Halliburton, that the world would need an additional 50 million barrels of oil a day by 2010. "So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies," he said. Here's a good line (You have to appreciate British snark): Oil industry executives and analysts say the law, which would permit Western companies to pocket up to three-quarters of profits in the early years, is the only way to get Iraq's oil industry back on its feet after years of sanctions, war and loss of expertise. Yep, oil industry executives say this is the only way to help the Iraqis. They're doing this for the Iraqi people's own good. Opponents say Iraq, where oil accounts for 95 per cent of the economy, is being forced to surrender an unacceptable degree of sovereignty. I think they've been waiting for things to "settle down" over there but that's not happening and they see that their time is running out so they're just gonna open things up now. Of course, since things aren't "settled down", these oil companies will need protection in order to extract the oil. They have two choices: 1) Hire private armies, bringing us even closer to a dystopian future where corporations are more powerful than governments or 2) Let the US army protect them, which puts our troops in the line of fire so that oil executives can have their profits (oh wait, that's been going on for years). By fnord12 | January 11, 2007, 1:18 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link The First 100 Hours Oh god yes let the Republicans filibuster a minimum wage increase. By fnord12 | January 11, 2007, 1:07 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link The Canadians Are Spying On Us Or mebbe it's the French. Or the Russians. Or the Chinese. Actually, it's prolly not the Canadians. Yeah. Prolly not them. Link c/o nsxt290. The government said the mysterious coins were found planted on U.S. contractors with classified security clearances on at least three separate occasions between October 2005 and January 2006 as the contractors traveled through Canada. ntelligence and technology experts said such transmitters, if they exist, could be used to surreptitiously track the movements of people carrying the spy coins. The U.S. report doesn't suggest who might be tracking American defense contractors or why. It also doesn't describe how the Pentagon discovered the ruse, how the transmitters might function or even which Canadian currency contained them. What an odd thing to say. Experts said hiding tracking technology inside coins is fraught with risks because the spy's target might inadvertently give away the coin or spend it buying coffee or a newspaper. But then again, a coin would be something that wouldn't seem suspicious in the least to find in your stuff. By min | January 11, 2007, 9:47 AM | Liberal Outrage & Science | Comments (1) | Link Zing! "George W. Bush spoke with all the confidence of a perp in a police lineup. I first interviewed the guy in 1987 and began covering his political rise in 1993, and I have never seen him, in public or private, look less convincing, less sure of himself, less cocky. With his knitted brow and stricken features, he looked, well, scared. Not surprising since what he was doing in the White House library was announcing the escalation of an unpopular war." - Howard Fineman, MSNBC Personally, i can't stand looking at the guy, let alone listening to him make a speech for over an hour (i'm assuming it was over an hour. i know it takes him at least that long to say "uh.....fluff buh?"), so i appreciate it when others take one for the team and not only sacrifice their time to sit there while Bush talks, but actually pay attention to the words coming out of his mouth. Thank you. By min | January 11, 2007, 9:21 AM | Liberal Outrage| Link Ten percent of the land By fnord12 | January 11, 2007, 9:12 AM | Music| Link Cancer Research I don't follow it at all, so mebbe this sort of thing is common. But it just seems odd to me to read about two discoveries related to treating cancer happening so close together. I'm paranoid that way. Get over it. So, earlier this week was the guy who figured out how to filter cancer cells out of the blood. Now this: What the hell's going on? What's with the surge in discoveries of late? Or have i just been missing all the other ones since talk about proteins and vessel walls is hardly an exciting topic? Or mebbe they have to get this problem off the table to make way for the next big bringer of death. I am the Bringer of Good Cheer. Cancer's been a big problem for a long time. The American Cancer Society prolly gets tons of money donated to them for research and still they haven't been able to come up with a cure. My paranoid side says this is because more money can be made from treating cancer than it can from curing cancer. There hasn't really been a cure for anything discovered since polio in 1955. What the hell are they doing with all that research money? Redecorating? Mebbe next week i'll read about the discovery of a way to protect MUC1 from galectin-3 and how the filter can be used to capture cancer cells and coat them in MUC1. I can't wait. By min | January 11, 2007, 8:55 AM | Science| Link
Jimi Yesterday my cat Jimi died. He was almost 16 years old which means he had been around for half my life. Today i am sad and feeling old. By fnord12 | January 10, 2007, 10:03 AM | My stupid life | Comments (1) | Link
All The Wrong People Owning Guns Two high school students got shot in Vegas by someone suffering from road rage. Montoya said the shooter and a student at the school nearly collided at a nearby gas station and the two drivers exchanged angry words. The shooter then followed the student to Western High School, outside downtown Las Vegas. "The suspect followed the car as it went into the high school parking lot and fired 4-7 shots, hitting one of the student passengers and an unrelated female who happened to be in the parking lot at the time," Montoya said. Too bad the guy wasn't equipped with a taser instead. I hear "they save lives by reducing the use of firearms." Except for the part where some people have died after a taser was used on them. The gun has however been at the centre of fresh controversy this weekend over the death of a man in Florida after police used a Taser to subdue him. Whoops. Mebbe in addition to a criminal background check, they should make people who want weapons to go through a mental health check. I'm pretty sure i don't want you having a gun or a taser if you're crazy even if you never committed a crime before. Actually, i'm pretty sure most people are crazy and stupid, so mebbe none of you should have weapons. If the government can make you wear seatbelts for your own good, they should also keep you from having firearms for the same reason. By min | January 9, 2007, 2:11 PM | Ummm... Other? | Comments (1) | Link
Cancer Cell Filter Scientist came up with a way to filter cancer cells and stem cells out of blood. He has figured out what types of proteins attract cancer cells and stem cells. By coating tubes with a particular protein and running blood through the tube, they can get those cells to stick to the walls and either give them a trigger to destroy themselves or harvest them. This procedure can be done in vivo (in the body) or in vitro (outside). The thinking is that such a device could be implanted in the body prior to surgery to remove a tumor because the surgery usually causes cancer cells to be released into the body. The filter could then capture and destroy the cancer cells instead of allowing them to flow thru the body, causing metastasis - cancer cells spreading from the primary location to a seconary location and forming a new tumor. So, how much do you want to bet that if this new discovery really works as well as they say, it will be sparingly used and will cost an atrocious amount and your insurance company won't touch it? Wouldn't want to really find a way to keep cancer from getting bad. That would cut into the pharmaceuticals' profit margins. By min | January 8, 2007, 3:17 PM | Science| Link
Pillow Angel This 9-year old girl has a mental disability that leaves her with the mental ability of a 3-month old. She can't walk. She can't talk. She can't feed herself. Her parents decided to have her given hormones to limit her height and weight and had her uterus and breast buds removed. They said that they did this so she can have a better life. Her perpetual child-like size will definitely make it easier for them to care for her as she gets older. And without a uterus, no worries about menstruation or pregnancy should she get assaulted. Their decision has caused a debate about the ethics of it. What i'm wondering is did they know before she was born that she would have this mental condition and if so, why did they carry the pregnancy to term? Not everybody likes the idea of abortion, but what kind of life is this girl having? Even if she wasn't given hormones and still had her uterus and breasts, what kind of life could she have? Is this better? Is this right? But mebbe it's not something you can know ahead of time. And then her parents have to make the best of the situation. Gone are the days of Vikings where a weak child could be left outside and not have it considered inhumane, and murder besides. In a cold and practical light, how can they not make decisions that would make it easier for them to care for her? They seem to be committed to caring for her for the rest of their lives. Considering the health care system and what it takes for people to care for a disabled family member, can you really blame them for their decision? The extent of my knowledge of this case is what i've read in a couple of articles that basically report the same thing. So if there's other info, i'd like to know. With just the info i have now, i'm not ready to condemn her parents on a breach of ethics. By min | January 5, 2007, 3:32 PM | Ummm... Other? | Comments (3) | Link Marvel Sales Analysis! Paul O'Brien's November Marvel sales analysis. By fnord12 | January 5, 2007, 3:28 PM | Comics| Link People scare me AP: _35 percent predict the military draft will be reinstated. _35 percent predict a cure for cancer will be found. _25 percent anticipate the second coming of Jesus Christ. _19 percent think scientists are likely to find evidence of extraterrestrial life. By fnord12 | January 5, 2007, 3:14 PM | Liberal Outrage| Link Bush Reading Your Mail What the hell is the deal with these "signing statements" anyway? Why the hell is he allowed to get away with that crap? The law generally prohibits opening first class mail without a warrant unless "there is credible evidence that a package contains a bomb or other dangerous material." I guess Bush and Co. are taking "dangerous material" to mean "foreign intelligence". Or anti-Bush propaganda. Or pro-choice propaganda. Or propaganda on keeping schools and government secular. At least Mussolini made sure the trains were on time. By min | January 5, 2007, 1:42 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1) | Link Hiya kids! I'm sorry this image is so big, but i don't have photoshop at work anymore*. By fnord12 | January 5, 2007, 11:11 AM | Comics | Comments (3) | Link
At My Job by the Dead Kennedys If your machine might slip a gear I'm working at my job Now it's time to take a break By fnord12 | January 4, 2007, 8:53 AM | Music| Link
Pears and Dirty Sinks I wore a long red dress. My hair was long again. I might have also worn pants. My parents and sister were there along with my dad's family. It was a banquet, a ceremony. Had to wash my pear in the dirty sink. Had to wait for the woman on crutches and the other with both legs in casts to get through the door first. I wanted to hold the door open for them, but it was filthy and i didn't want to touch it. Then it was a high school ceremony. A tournament. Dodgeball. Look at the pretty colors. By min | January 3, 2007, 3:33 PM | My Dreams| Link Morning Death Report You guys are a bunch of slackers. I'm gone for a week and not one of you thinks to let me know Ford kicked it. That, plus they hanged Saddam. Who else died that i don't know about? By the by, didn't anyone think it might be in poor taste to dress the "executioners" up in ski masks so that they looked just like the rebels/terrorists running around kidnapping and beheading people? Just a thought. By min | January 3, 2007, 3:28 PM | My stupid life | Comments (1) | Link
Cranky old man Does it say more about me or the video game industry that the only games i keep getting excited about as i flip through the video game magazine i got suckered into subscribing to turn out to be coming out for the portable systems? And then i'm terribly disappointed when it turns out i can only play the game on a 2 inch screen. By fnord12 | January 2, 2007, 5:18 PM | Video Games | Comments (3) | Link The dangers of home schooling Learn about "lightening" and how it works on this home schooling science page. By fnord12 | January 2, 2007, 5:16 PM | Ummm... Other? | Comments (1) | Link Finally! We are up and running once again through absolutely no effort on our part. Our webhost ICDSoft was experiencing some technical difficulties in Boston. Fucking Boston. They fixed it. Obliviously. Unfortunately for you, it's past time for me to go home so you shall have no delicious tidbits to keep you occupied for the rest of the day unless fnord12 is feeling generous. Ah well. Sucks for you. Have some rum punch. By min | January 2, 2007, 4:11 PM | My stupid life| Link |