Ignorance or Deliberate Racism?
The latest newsletter by an Inland Republican women's group depicts Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama surrounded by a watermelon, ribs and a bucket of fried chicken, prompting outrage in political circles.
You can check out the rest of the article here.
The president of the group claims she had no idea it was racist in any way.
She said she doesn't think in racist terms, pointing out she once supported Republican Alan Keyes, an African-American who previously ran for president.
And some of my friends are black, too!
I'm trying to figure out if she sent this out totally oblivious to the racism inherent in the imagery, was unaware that there were African American members of the group and therefore didn't think she'd get called out on it, or knew she was being racist and didn't care if it offended the minority members because she didn't want them in the group anyway.
I think the first option is just too unbelievable. You can't live in this country and not know referencing fried chicken, ribs, and watermelon in conjunction with a black person is playing on the stereotype.
My vote is for #2. It just seems the most likely to me. She just didn't think that among "her people" she would have to worry about being PC.
My question is why are minorities still under the illusion that the Republican party in any way welcomes them? Those minority members who belong to this group ought to really rethink their choices. How much more proof do you need? The current Republican presidential and vice presidential candidates are deliberately stirring up the most racist elements in their supporters with their rhetoric of late, and it wasn't until it got really ugly and it looked like they were going to experience backlash from the public before some Republicans came out against it. Is this really the party you want to support?
By min | October 16, 2008, 3:46 PM | Liberal Outrage
What a brazen lie. I can't believe you give her even the slightest benefit of the doubt that there might be an "option 1", even if you do immediately dismiss it as "too unbelieveable".