Sidebar
 
Character Search
 
SuperMegaMonkey's Marvel Comics Chronology
Obsessively putting our comics in chronological order since 1985.
  Secret: Click here to toggle sidebar

 Search issues only
Advanced Search

SuperMegaMonkey
Godzilla Timeline

The Rules
Q&As
Quality Rating
Acknowledgements
Recent Updates
What's Missing?
General Comments
Forum

Comments page

1971-07-01 00:02:30
Previous:
Hulk #141
Up:
Main

1971 / Box 6 / Silver Age

Next:
Captain America: Sentinel of Liberty #8-9

Amazing Spider-Man #96-98

Issue(s): Amazing Spider-Man #96, Amazing Spider-Man #97, Amazing Spider-Man #98
Cover Date: May-Jul 71
Title: "--And now, the Goblin!" / "In the grip of the Goblin!" / "The Goblin's last gasp!"
Credits:
Stan Lee - Writer
Gil Kane - Penciler
Tony Mortellaro & John Romita Sr. / Frank Giacoia & Tony Mortellaro - Inker

Review/plot:
Gil Kane and John Romita have been alternating pencils every six issues or so but the book has a certain consistency to it. There was a house style for drawing all of these characters that ensured that they looked similar no matter who was drawing. Also, unlike a lot of Marvel books at this time, the artists for Spider-Man (and the FF) used simple, clean panels without a lot of experimentation for experimentation's sake, and the book always looks good. Those are some oddly dressed drug dealers, though.

These are the famous drug issues that caused some controversy when they were published. At the request of the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Stan Lee wrote an anti-drug story. I'll repeat that: an anti-drug story. However, at the time, the Comics Code Authority forbid the depiction of drug use so it wouldn't approve the comics. Marvel printed the stories without the CCA stamp, and this led to the CCA making its restrictions a little more sane (but not much, as we'll see when we talk about zuvembies).

The gist of the drug-related plot is that Harry is stressed out over school, his father, and (mainly) the crappy way that Mary Jane treats him...

...and he's been abusing sleeping pills. Later a kid at school hooks him up with LSD.

Similarly, Spider-Man rescues a young black kid who jumps off a building while high on LSD.

Randy Robertson makes the point that drugs are a problem for everyone, including rich white kids. It's not just a ghetto problem.

That's it, really. Nothing controversial there at all, even by the standards of the day, i would think. If anything, it probably felt a bit preachy to the counterculture audience who made up a fair share of Marvel's fanbase.

MJ has a dance gig this issue, and Norman pays for a bunch of the kids to go and see it, since MJ is theoretically dating his son.

Also in these issues, Norman Osborn reverts to his Green Goblin identity and seeks out Peter...

...who has been working part time at Oscorp. It is seeing his sick son that stops him and seemingly snaps him out of insanity.

Peter starts dressing like a druggie these issues himself.

Finally, Gwen recovers from the mourning of her father and returns to the U.S. where she and Peter get back together.

Quality Rating: C

Historical Significance Rating: 6 - "This is it! The controversial anti-drug abuse three part epic! Complete and unabridged!" Mainly important from a meta-level since it caused the CCA to re-examine its code, but also establishes a like-father-like-son lack of stability in Harry.

Chronological Placement Considerations: Peter starts these issues flying home from London, so he can't appear in any other books in between this issue and #95.

References:

  • A flashback in this issue conflates scenes from Spider-Man's fights with the Green Goblin from Amazing Spider-Man #39-40
    and Spectacular Spider-Man Magazine #2.

Crossover: N/A

Continuity Insert? N

My Reprint: Marvel Tales #191

Inbound References (2): show

  • Amazing Spider-Man #238-239
  • Amazing Spider-Man #249-251

Characters Appearing: Aunt May, Aunt Watson, Betty Brant, Green Goblin (Norman Osborn), Gwen Stacy, Harry Osborn, J. Jonah Jameson, Joe 'Robbie' Robertson, Mary Jane Watson, Randy Robertson, Spider-Man

Previous:
Hulk #141
Up:
Main

1971 / Box 6 / Silver Age

Next:
Captain America: Sentinel of Liberty #8-9

Comments

I had these issues back when I was 14 and I had no problem with the drug references in the story. In fact we had watched our share of anti-drug propaganda films and been taught in the 7th grade about the side effects of a lot of drugs. Was enough to scare me from using, at least. So to use me as an example, these were nothing to get worried about as far as drug content.

Posted by: Mike | June 29, 2014 9:07 PM

"[Norman] Osborn and I share a deadly secret together...we're both boning Gwen!"

(Yes, the Most Disgusting Retcon of All Time allegedly takes place right before this. Sorry, I have to vent.)

And speaking of bad retcons, it's one thing if Mary Jane is just acting like a flighty twat who's decided that Peter is a step up from Harry and she's going to snag him now that Gwen's away; it's another if she's "always known" that Peter is Spidey and the only reason she dated Harry was to stay close to Pete.

The issues themselves are cool, if a little over-the-top. But I love Gil Kane, and drug-addled freakouts are right up his nostril, er, alley.

Posted by: Dan Spector | August 1, 2014 5:59 PM

Truly momentous from a comic history standpoint. But a good story on its own, with very good art - especially that panel to end the issue with the return of the full memory of the Green Goblin.

As for the Gwen retcon - well, that's dumber than Alicia being a Skrull. As far as I'm concerned, it never happened.

Posted by: Erik Beck | February 7, 2015 11:30 AM

Fringed suede leather jackets like Peter is wearing were a popular style in 1971, although I've never seen anyone wear a sleeveless one. Still, my point is that one didn't necessarily have to be a druggie to wear one. Teachers, students, and probably well over 50% of younger people of both genders wore the so-called hippie styles. Patched and embroidered bell bottom blue jeans, fringe jackets, field jackets, long hair, granny glasses, and unisex styles were everywhere, especially among the under-30 crowd, but even a lot of the older people were wearing those styles. They weren't hippies, they were just following the trends. I only ever met one hippie in my life, and he was just in from California, where the trend in styles began in the late 60s. Musicians, Hollywood, TV, and clothing manufacturers helped to spread the styles. Then, only quite a bit later in the 70s, did the leisure suits and disco styles take over.

Posted by: Holt | October 14, 2017 8:38 PM

Stan Lee apparently had wanted to do a story like this for a while, per his comments in Marvel Tribune #9(10/68):"What bothers me is that I wanted to very desperately do a story about drugs. We can't even mention drugs and I said to the Code, 'Look, I'm not going to do a story saying the whole world should become drug-oriented, I just want to mention them, base a story on them.' "

Posted by: Mark Drummond | January 20, 2018 4:53 PM

Not long after these issues were published, DC ventured into the same area in Green Lantern / Green Arrow, which the Comics Code did approve - was this the result of their relaxing their restrictions ?
It makes a mockery of the claim about the Lantern stories being "relevant" that their anti-drugs story came after the Marvel one and was Code approved and the Lantern story is just boring, like all of the other overrated O'Neil / Adams issues, but I am going off topic here. Spider-Man #96-8 are great issues and not just because they are drawn by my favourite artist, the writing was powerful and emotional stuff when I first read these issues in '75 and they still hold up today.
And I fully agree with the comments about the Gwen / Osborn retcon above. My opinion of JMS nosedived with that storyline and I suspect I am not unique with that view.

Posted by: Mike Teague | January 21, 2018 2:32 AM

The DC story is generally better-remembered and considered more "relevant" because it is comparatively more "realistic" in its treatment of drugs: the drug involved is heroin, not generic "pills," and there are elements like an overdose and withdrawal symptoms, albeit compressed for comic-book purposes. Additionally, Speedy is portrayed unusually sympathetically, and Green Arrow is shown (for once) to be a loutish hypocrite whose neglect of his ward and self-righteous attitude contribute to his sidekick's addiction. Having the hero's failings play out this way was not the norm for the time, especially at squeaky-clean, shiny National Comics.

None of that means anyone has to like the Green Lantern/Green Arrow story better than this one, but it does drive home that Stan's story employs drug abuse as a plot element in a "Spider-Man vs. Green Goblin" story while the O'Neil and Adams story is an attempt to do a story about real-world drug abuse. Stan's desire to "mention" drugs is petty clearly reflected in the execution of his story; O'Neil and Adams's remit, at the request of public health officials, to address the drug problem itself is equally clear int he execution of theirs.

Posted by: Omar Karindu | January 21, 2018 12:05 PM

I would certainly give the Spider-Man story the win. It was far subtler than GL/GA and more effective in a world-building way. Spidey has other things going on in his life. Gwen's gone, Aunt May and Mrs. Watson are going out to see "Hair," MJ's got a new gig and is flirting with Pete, the Green Goblin is back, and suddenly he finds his roommate strung out on drugs.

The problem with GL/GA - which O'Neil and Adams have admitted - is that dealing with social issues and superheroes is kind of ridiculous, so they always need the bad guy to start trying to kill people or something like that so he can be put in jail by the end. I think the Spidey story works very well in terms of describing a problem that can't be solved by putting on tights and punching someone.

Norman and Randy's argument feels really 'forced,' but maybe that's just the 45-year time lapse talking.

Posted by: ChrisW | January 21, 2018 7:57 PM




Post a comment

(Required & displayed)
(Required but not displayed)
(Not required)

Note: Please report typos and other obvious mistakes in the forum. Not here! :-)



Comments are now closed.

UPC Spider-Man
SuperMegaMonkey home | Comics Chronology home