Home
|
« Liberal Outrage: February 2014 | Main | Liberal Outrage: April 2014 » Liberal OutrageIt's ok as long as you ask By fnord12 | March 27, 2014, 11:37 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link By fnord12 | March 27, 2014, 11:05 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link "Just pull those selectors, queue them up for QUANTUM, and proceed with the pwnage," the author of the posts writes. ("Pwnage," short for "pure ownage," is gamer-speak for defeating opponents.) The author adds, triumphantly, "Yay! /throws confetti in the air." By min | March 25, 2014, 12:35 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link It also prefers late to bed, late to rise. By fnord12 | March 13, 2014, 6:54 PM | Liberal Outrage | Comments (1)| Link Welcome to the rest of us. Guess what? We don't like to be spied on any more than you do. By fnord12 | March 12, 2014, 11:16 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link Kevin Drum says it's not hard. By fnord12 | March 10, 2014, 12:42 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link You've had a few to drink. You're not exactly in any condition to make good decisions. So, it's totally not your fault you grabbed that chick's boob. Your thinking was impaired. You are totally a great guy when sober. Rilly. Tina Zawacki, a psychology professor at the University of Texas at San Antonio, agrees with that assessment. "It could be that drinkers use intoxication as an excuse to engage in a number of socially unacceptable behaviors, including sexual harassment and sexual assault." Yes, let's please stop putting the onus on the victim. Ofc people should always take some precautions to ensure their safety in every aspect of life. Look before stepping into a street. Don't talk to strangers. Drink responsibly. I got it. But we don't go around saying "Well, you shouldn't have gone and gotten yourself stabbed.". So why is it ok to say "Well, you shouldn't have gone and gotten raped."? While i'm being cautious and whatnot, shouldn't there be more focus on everybody doing what they can to prevent sexual aggression? The message shouldn't be "Hey, ladies, don't get drunk and end up raped.". It should be "Hey, everybody, acting like this is wrong. Don't do it. Don't let your friends do it.". As the article states, there's a cultural shift that needs to be made. We're not there yet. By min | March 7, 2014, 10:51 AM | Liberal Outrage & Science | Comments (1)| Link I really wish he wasn't retiring, but i have hopes he's not going away entirely. Certainly when you have elected representatives ... inventing ideas about a woman's biology ... it's not just that they didn't take sex education classes in school. It's that they're just not grounded in evidence ... I am not saying that scientists are smarter or wiser than other folks. But there are habits of mind: you know, a deep appreciation of evidence; an ability to deal with probability and statistics, to be alert to cognitive biases and tricks that our minds play on ourselves; ... a willingness to accept tentative conclusions and accept ... the uncertainty of these scientific conclusions -- not as reason for inaction, but a way of finding the best path forward ... After the electoral errors of 2000 ... Congress passed an election reform bill and pushed ... the voting districts in America toward unverifiable electronic machines ... They were sold a bill of goods, essentially, by the voting machine manufacturers ... No one involved in writing the legislation had bothered to ask ..."What are the results? How do we know that your machine records the results that the people think they're casting?" And it turns out there is no way to audit the machines ... Just some critical thinking; you wouldn't have to know anything about the software, or about the electronics of the machine, to be able to ask the kinds of questions that any scientist would ask ... By min | March 6, 2014, 11:48 AM | Liberal Outrage & Science | Link « Liberal Outrage: February 2014 | Main | Liberal Outrage: April 2014 » |