"No longer like a toad in these foul cellars will I secret the venom of hatred -- for you shall bring me love!" - Erik
|
Home
|
« Liberal Outrage: September 2017 | Main | Liberal Outrage: November 2017 » Liberal OutrageIt's not a queue as long as we pretend not to notice Right now you mostly only hear about stuff like this and this on Twitter (and personal experiences, ofc). But the minute President Bernie Sanders signs Single Payer into law in 2021, it will officially become A Problem. By fnord12 | October 28, 2017, 12:44 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link MightyGodKing hasn't posted in a while, but he's back with an analysis of some semi obscure (and some not-so-obscure) movies with what i would call Historical Significance which are not readily available via any streaming service. Most of these movies, in my stupid opinion, should be in the public domain by now and therefore would be freely available for any service. Relatedly, this is why i prefer to have my own video file library; even if things are available for streaming at the moment, there's no guarantee that they always will be. The kids today, with their Kodi streaming plug-ins, don't seem to understand that (and/or care). When i first read the above, there was was a comment that left me scratching my head, and it turns out that MGK has addressed that comment in a follow-up post. I grant that Blockbuster wasn't very good, but our local EZVideo was pretty great, especially if Netflix's "Nothing But Made For SyFy" selection is the comparison point. If nothing else, MGK has made me want to seek out Dark of the Sun for the chainsaw fight. By fnord12 | October 23, 2017, 12:51 PM | Liberal Outrage
& Movies | Link Why is the foster system for-profit??? The investigation, conducted and released in rare bipartisan fashion by the Senate Finance Committee, looked closely at one of the largest private providers of foster care services, the MENTOR Network. The companies and agencies charged with keeping foster children safe often failed to provide the most basic protections or take steps to prevent tragedies, the investigation found. In the wake of the report, shares of the MENTOR Network's parent company, Civitas Solutions, traded sharply downward, but quickly rebounded amid a lack of press coverage. As always, only life that involves controlling a woman's womb merits attention. By min | October 22, 2017, 3:37 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link The Intercept focuses on Keith Ellison's predicament. By fnord12 | October 20, 2017, 3:08 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link Part one of a series by Katie Halper. By fnord12 | October 19, 2017, 3:04 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link Link: What that article doesn't mention is that disgraced former DNC head Donna Brazile has been added back , and so has the guy who runs the Georgia Restaurant Association and opposes the Fight For Fifteen (which is technically a party plank). Also lots of lobbyists and Clinton loyalists. I remember when we were told that the Ellison vs. Perez battle was pointless since Perez was every bit as progressive as Ellison. By fnord12 | October 19, 2017, 2:54 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link ...So, it seems, a modest UBI really would help cushion families' financial security. A low UBI would also have significant ramifications for America's financial sector, for the better of many Americans. It is no secret that it is expensive to be poor in America. Financial institutions make a significant amount of money every year by taking advantage of people who are unable to make ends meet in the short term. A low UBI would substantially diminish many Americans' reliance on exploitative financial products, saving billions in fees and interest payments on top of the cash payments themselves. Two products that would be directly addressed by a partial UBI are overdraft fees and payday loans. Postal banking would also address some of these issues, but like the girl in the taco commercial says, "Why don't we have both?". By fnord12 | October 19, 2017, 10:23 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link Vox: ... But despite the industry effort to date, cocoa still has never been proven to carry any long-term health benefits. And when it's delivered with a big dose of fat and sugar, any potential health perks are very quickly outweighed by chocolate's potential harm to the waistline. By fnord12 | October 18, 2017, 3:21 PM | Liberal Outrage & Science | Link A former consultant to Bill Clinton has an OpEd complaining about Bernie Sanders' influence on the Dem party platform, saying, "Memories in politics are short, but those policies are vastly different from the program of the party's traditional center-left coalition." No, we remember. That's not the problem. Dean Baker responds in more detail. By fnord12 | October 18, 2017, 12:18 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link I'm torn about whether or not Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse sounds hopelessly naive, but i'm rooting for him. By fnord12 | October 17, 2017, 8:18 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link For reference, see this from four years ago when Obama's nominees were getting held up due to this "rule". "The majority"--that is, Republicans--will treat a blue slip "as simply notification of how you're going to vote, not as an opportunity to blackball," McConnell told me. The use of blue slips, he noted, is not a Senate rule and has "been honored in the breach over the years." Now it won't be honored at all. The only people shocked by this are the Democrats, who are shocked by everything. By fnord12 | October 11, 2017, 2:20 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link Link: By fnord12 | October 11, 2017, 10:37 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link In the US we have the freedom to be denied them entirely. By fnord12 | October 9, 2017, 12:13 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link If Bernie Sanders' campaign proved anything, it's that campaigning for issues can make those issues more popular - you can see that through the increased popularity of things like Single Payer as well as the explosion in membership of the DSA. So the Democrats' idea to run fake ads convincing Republican voters to vote for extreme candidates in their primaries is not just a dirty trick and hypocritical after all their "fake news" complaints, it's also counter-productive in the long term because they'll be spending money to promote extreme right wing ideas. By fnord12 | October 9, 2017, 12:08 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link I thought this was an interesting outside (i.e. non comic person) perspective on the Marvel/Northrop Grumman fiasco. Regarding what he says about "facing criticism from the right for what they believe is a liberal agenda", see Bigoted Santa Claus. By fnord12 | October 9, 2017, 11:43 AM | Comics
& Liberal Outrage | Link There's always been a little bit of a debate about whether or not vegans should eat honey. I don't eat it, but i acknowledge that the main reasons for being vegan don't necessarily apply to honey. But it turns out you should probably be avoiding it anyway. And that's all of course beyond the main point of the article, which is that we are killing the creatures that pollinate our crops. By fnord12 | October 7, 2017, 11:29 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link It's bad enough he's been positioning himself as the anti-populist, but now: Yeah, it worked alright, but it was nothing to look back on with wistful fondness. By fnord12 | October 6, 2017, 7:01 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link This reads like the start of a disaster-horror movie where it turns out that the pigs had some sort of mutant disease or something, but it's really just the meat industry using the power of the federal government to suppress some bad PR. By fnord12 | October 5, 2017, 6:20 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link If we could somehow get Trump surrounded by better people, it might have a profoundly positive effect (click through to the AP article too). By fnord12 | October 5, 2017, 11:47 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link Stephanie Kelton again. Unfortunately the timing kind of sucks because it's in the context of Republican tax cuts. We could have used more of this when we were debating the size of the 2008 stimulus, or hell, even when/if we get to Trump's infrastructure bill. But hopefully it'll be the beginning of a change in the way we talk about deficits. By fnord12 | October 5, 2017, 11:08 AM | Liberal Outrage | Link Here is a long essay by Asad Haider addressing (in part) Ta-Nehisi Coates' recent (and also long) article. Coates has long had a weird blind spot where he's argued on the assumption that class-based struggle and race-based struggle are exclusive tracks (i.e. the antiquated and rightly disputed idea that racism is just a subset of classism), which has never been entirely true and it's been a fringe view among socialists for a long long time. Coates has seemed so obtuse on that point that i'd assume he was just against socialism, but that doesn't seem to be the case (he voted for Bernie Sanders saying it was "awesome" and "great" that an "avowed socialist" had a serious shot at the nomination). So i'm interested in where Coates is coming from. This article by Asad Haider is uncharitable to Coates but it's at least an attempt to address his points. By fnord12 | October 4, 2017, 6:16 PM | Liberal Outrage | Link « Liberal Outrage: September 2017 | Main | Liberal Outrage: November 2017 » |